The Ethics of Memory Modification: Personal Narratives, Relational Selves and Autonomy

Abstract For nearly two decades, ethicists have expressed concerns that the further development and use of memory modification technologies (MMTs)—techniques allowing to intentionally selectively alter memories—may threaten very foundations who we are, our personal identity, thus pose a threat well-being, or even undermine “humaneness.” This paper examines potential ramifications memory-modifying interventions such as changing valence targeted memories selective deactivation particular these appear be at same time potentially both most promising clinically well menacing identity. However, unlike previous works discussing consequences MMTs, this article analyzes them in context narrative relational approach identity issues related autonomy. I argue perspective brings light ethical aspects moral arising from MMTs been hidden previously adopted approaches. In particular, demonstrates how important social which an individual lives is for evaluation given intervention. conclude by suggesting undertaking modifications without taking into account dimension person’s life creates risk she will not able meet one basic human needs—the autonomous construction maintenance Based on conclusion, offer some reflections permissibility advisability what considerations suggest future.